|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006 Posts: 249 Location: USA
|
Stem cells rescue nerve cells by direct contact 1-Feb-2010 Scientists at the Swedish medical university Karolinska Institutet have shown how transplanted stem cells can connect with and rescue threatened neurons and brain tissue. The results point the way to new possible treatments for brain damage and neurodegenerative diseases. A possible strategy for treating neurodegenerative diseases is to transplant stem cells into the brain that prevent existing nerve cells from dying. The method has proved successful in different models, but the mechanisms behind it are still unknown. According to one hypothesis, the stem cells mature into fully-mature neurons that communicate with the threatened brain tissue; according to another, the stem cells secrete various growth factors that affect the host neurons. The new report, co-authored by several international research groups and lead by Karolinska Institutet, shows that stem cells transplanted into damaged or threatened nerve tissue quickly establish direct channels, called gap junctions, to the nerve cells. Stem cells actively bring diseased neurons back from the brink via cross-talk through gap junctions, the connections between cells that allow molecular signals to pass back and forth. The study found that the nerve cells were prevented from dying only when these gap junctions were formed. The results were obtained from mice and human stem cells in cultivated brain tissue, and from a series of rodent models for human neurodegenerative diseases and acute brain injuries. "Many different molecules can be transported through gap junctions," says Eric Herlenius, who led the study. "This means that a new door to the possible future treatment of neuronal damage has been opened, both figuratively and literally." The international team of scientist, beside Karolinska Institutet, included researchers from Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, Harvard Medical School and Université Libre de Bruxelles. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/ki-scr020110.php
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/30/2006 Posts: 249 Location: USA
|
New form of stem cell communication rescues diseased neurons International effort demonstrates cross-talk between implanted stem cells and diseased cells in mouse model LA JOLLA, Calif., February 1, 2010 -- Investigators at Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute (Sanford-Burnham, formerly Burnham Institute for Medical Research), the Karolinska Institutet, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Harvard Medical School and Université Libre de Bruxelles have demonstrated in mouse models that transplanted stems cells, when in direct contact with diseased neurons, send signals through specialized channels that rescue the neurons from death. These direct cell-to-cell connections may also play a role in normal development by laying down the blueprint for more mature electrical connections between neurons and other cells. The research was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on February 1. While it was already known that stem cells will seek out diseased cells in the brain, the international group of scientists showed, both in tissue culture and in mice, that the stem cells actively bring diseased neurons back from the brink via cross-talk through gap junctions, the connections between cells that allow molecular signals to pass back and forth. Significantly, the stem cells do not need to differentiate into the specific type of neuron to provide this therapeutic effect. The researchers also believe this protective mechanism may be active in other cell types and play a role in many diseases. For example, some of their preliminary work shows that these mechanisms may rescue damaged neural fibers in adult spinal cord injuries. "We showed a while ago that stems cells may exert a therapeutic effect on damaged or diseased host systems by secreting therapeutic factors and 'bathing' the dying cells," said Evan Snyder, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology program at Sanford-Burnham. "However, we did not know that stem cells can also exert their action through direct cell-to-cell contact. Indeed, we believe that this may be a newly-recognized way in which stem cells communicate with the cells around them, not only under diseased conditions but during normal development." "Grafted neural stem cells of mouse and human origin make early gap junction contact with cells in the host brain that benefit endangered host neurons, even rescuing them from impending cell death," added Richard L. Sidman, M.D., Professor of Neuropathology (Neuroscience) at BIDMC, Boston and Harvard Medical School. Beginning with tissue culture studies, the team found that neural stem cells (NSCs, including human NSCs) integrated into the neural circuitry, coordinated signaling (as measured by calcium fluxes) and protected injured neurons. The team replicated these findings in diseased mice (including those that have a disorder similar to Huntington's disease) and spinal-injured rats. The scientists, led by Eric Herlenius, Ph.D., of the Karolinska Institutet and Dr. Snyder, hypothesized that communication through gap junctions was the mechanism for the protective effect. Subsequently, the researchers disabled gap junctions, which diminished the therapeutic effect and validated the gap junction hypothesis. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/smri-nfo020110.php
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/14/2009 Posts: 782 Location: United States
|
This is good news..Does anyone know if neuronal type cells are among the ones being injected at Emory? If so these results above could show efficacy in time..Ron
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/27/2008 Posts: 48 Location: San Jose, California
|
Does anyone have information on how the first patient at Emory injected with stem cells is doing? Wishing him quick recovery. Warior
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/7/2009 Posts: 486 Location: Montana
|
Great posts, ALSYOYO. Yes, Ron, Neuralstem uses both glial and neural cells for their stem cell treatment. According to a passage in their executive informational overview, the cells reliably differentiate into 50% neural and 50% glial types. Also, they claim 95-100% cell survival post-transplantation into animals.
Without hope there is nothing.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/14/2009 Posts: 782 Location: United States
|
Big Mike wrote:Great posts, ALSYOYO. Yes, Ron, Neuralstem uses both glial and neural cells for their stem cell treatment. According to a passage in their executive informational overview, the cells reliably differentiate into 50% neural and 50% glial types. Also, they claim 95-100% cell survival post-transplantation into animals.
Then let's all pray the information is correct in ALSYOYO'S posts..We should see improvement even in patients who's progression is advanced..Lets hope the news is so good they skip phase two and start clinical injections.. Lot to hope for and I usually don't get my hopes to high..Been dejected to many times..This one may hold water..Ron
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/23/2009 Posts: 544 Location: United Kingdom
|
Big Mike wrote:Great posts, ALSYOYO. Yes, Ron, Neuralstem uses both glial and neural cells for their stem cell treatment. According to a passage in their executive informational overview, the cells reliably differentiate into 50% neural and 50% glial types. Also, they claim 95-100% cell survival post-transplantation into animals.
By 'animals' do you mean 'mice' ?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 2/7/2009 Posts: 486 Location: Montana
|
DeeBee wrote:
By 'animals' do you mean 'mice' ?
Hi DeeBee, I believe they used rats in their animal experiments. Mike
Without hope there is nothing.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/15/2009 Posts: 61 Location: Spain
|
One question or better two: What kind of cells are used in Monterrey Tec and sorry for mentioning the unmentionable? Are those cells, I mean neural and glial cells, embryonic ones? Ron, I'm glad to see you optimistic because when the most skeptical in the forum is able to make this " ![[clap]](/forum/images/emoticons/eusa_clap.gif) " not one but three times, it happens one of these things: the day is sunny and birds are whistling where you live (here it's very very windy, cloudy and wet) or you've drunk something spiritoso or there is really a step forward in ALS cure. 1/3 isn't bad. Cristina
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/17/2004 Posts: 1,665 Location: Texas
|
The ones in Monterrey are CD133+ stem cells taken from the patients blood. Being from blood they are neither neural nor embryonic stem cells.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/15/2009 Posts: 61 Location: Spain
|
Thank you, Wayne. I have another more question (really I have hundreds, but it's enough for me only this by the moment) Where do they take at Emory's trial neural cells from? I know they are human neural stem cells, but whose are those cells? donors?
Cristina
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2007 Posts: 1,018 Location: USA
|
http://www.neuralstem.com/index.asp?pgid=1Fetal tissue from donors.
-- Le meilleur vin avec les meilleurs amis
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/15/2009 Posts: 61 Location: Spain
|
I beg pardon for my silly curiosity. Are donors dead or alive?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/17/2004 Posts: 1,665 Location: Texas
|
Its really hard to imagine a mother having herself opened up, and then her fetus opened up to donate fetal tissue from a live fetus that is intended to be delivered. Almost assuredly this is a dead fetus. Now whether that means a miscarriage or an abortion I don't know. Hopefully the former, because if its from an abortion, then once pro-life advocates get wind of it there will be protests.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2007 Posts: 1,018 Location: USA
|
It depends on your religious viewpoint.
The tissue comes from 8-week (2 month) old fetal tissue. Full human gestation is 9 months with a rough minimum of 7 for survival with significant post-natal life support.
-- Le meilleur vin avec les meilleurs amis
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/14/2009 Posts: 782 Location: United States
|
criscapelo wrote:One question or better two: What kind of cells are used in Monterrey Tec and sorry for mentioning the unmentionable? Are those cells, I mean neural and glial cells, embryonic ones? Ron, I'm glad to see you optimistic because when the most skeptical in the forum is able to make this " ![[clap]](/forum/images/emoticons/eusa_clap.gif) " not one but three times, it happens one of these things: the day is sunny and birds are whistling where you live (here it's very very windy, cloudy and wet) or you've drunk something spiritoso or there is really a step forward in ALS cure. 1/3 isn't bad. Cristina Raining like hell and I don't drink, so I have finally found a possible treatment I think has merit for us.Plus they are finally putting stem cells in humans..We need more trials like this all over..I would like to see the California project be FDA approved also..Same people like pushed the Emory trial type people need to get behind them and ALSTDI if they come up with a viable line of cells. We need more stem cells in humans..Ron
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/14/2009 Posts: 782 Location: United States
|
They also have several thousands of frozen embryo's that will be thrown away that they can use....The point on Religion is a moot point..The abortions are going to happen anyway, so the crime has already been committed.. Once the abortion is complete, why not use the cells to save a life..The baby has already been destroyed.. And I am a Catholic. It's stupid to allow abortions and not use the fetus for something useful. One other option is embilacal cords.. my opinion Ron
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/17/2004 Posts: 1,665 Location: Texas
|
Ron,
Note that I wasn't advocating a position either way, just stating the opinion that if these cells came from aborted fetuses and if the pro-life movement hears of it, they will object. I suspect that it hasn't made it on their radar screens.
If the cells come from a miscarriage than I doubt any group will object and thus one less headache for us to worry about.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/30/2008 Posts: 143 Location: USA
|
RL Schafferr wrote: ...The point on Religion is a mute point..
"Moot" but not "mute", sadly.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/14/2009 Posts: 782 Location: United States
|
Wayne wrote:Ron,
Note that I wasn't advocating a position either way, just stating the opinion that if these cells came from aborted fetuses and if the pro-life movement hears of it, they will object. I suspect that it hasn't made it on their radar screens.
If the cells come from a miscarriage than I doubt any group will object and thus one less headache for us to worry about. I agree , Wayne..It seems like the pro-life movement fights very little on legalize abortion issues but raises hell using already dead fetuses for something like saving lives.. I argue with my Priest all the time on this. There will always be abortions for one reason or another. That doesn't seem to bother the dumb asses.. But we don't need any hassles for sure..If a few pro-lifers had ALS I bet you would see an immediate about face..My humble opinion..Ron
|
|
|
Guest |