Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/27/2011 Posts: 437 Location: United States
|
There are a number of cautions involved with this.
First you must realize that chlorite is a free radical. It can cause oxidative stress to the body. The body runs on oxidation, so it is capable of handling the oxidative stress up to a point. However, when you exceed that point you can do damage.
Sodium chlorite is a stable form of chlorine dioxide. It has an alkaline PH. When you lower its PH, chlorous acid is formed and chlorine dioxide gas is released. At higher concentrations, chlorine dioxide is a bleaching agent and is used in the pulp and paper industry to bleach pulp.
At lower concentrations it is used for water disinfection, sanitation, biofilm removal, and as a biostat rinse for food processing.
With water purification chlorite is the disinfection by product from chlorine dioxide treatment. The chlorite left in the water is regulated and dictates the amount of chlorine dioxide that can be used.
Chlorine dioxide is great for bleaching flour, bleaching pulp, disinfecting water, sanitizing hard surfaces, and keeping the bacterial growth on food down to acceptable levels, but translating its success in these areas to using it inside the human body has not been studied and there may be side effects involved in long term use.
Since it hasn't been studied, no one knows.
People have been drinking solutions of sodium chlorite since the mid 1960's. Adverse effects have been reported, but no deaths. I will go out on a limb here and boldly state that ingesting small amounts of sodium chlorite is not lethal. In addition, the saftey studies done with NP001 show that small amounts of chlorite are considered safe.
The more recent "crazes" of ingesting sodium chlorite involve Vitamin O, Nzymes Ox-E-Drops, and MMS.
At higher concentrations people report vomiting, nausea, and explosive diarrhea. This is usually enough to get people to back down, and these symptoms seem to be short lived. There are many variables involved, but these symptoms seem to start to manifest when the intake of chlorite reaches about 1.0 mg/kg of body weight. Once again, this is anecdotal, so don't treat it as a hard number.
If anyone is entertaining the ideal of ingesting a sodium chlorite solution, you need to be aware of these adverse effects and have a plan in place to counter them. Since chlorite is a free radical, vitamin C (an antioxidant) will neutralize chlorite, as will most other antioxidants.
The problem is that chlorite has a half life of over 40 hours so it may take a few days to get back to "normal."
After reading all of this you may no longer be interested in becoming a test rat and that may be a good choice. On the other hand the question has been brought up about the difference between IV infusion of chlorite and ingestion of chlorite.
There is a difference. With IV use you can achieve higher levels. This brings the question to how much is needed... I believe that is part of what is being studied in the clinical trial. With ingestion lower levels are achieved and by taking the solution over a longer period of time you get more exposure to chlorite than what is currently being done with the IV infusions.
No one knows what level of chlorite is therapeutic. This is all a big experiment. So far no one trying sodium chlorite has reported that their ALS condition has been aggravated and their rate of decline increased. Some have reported some minor improvements in 8 - 10 days of taking it.
I don't think drinking a sodium chlorite solution will replace NP001 or WF-10. I don't know if drinking a sodium chlorite solution will help people with ALS. All of these have chlorite in common, so there may be something there, but it has not been tested.
In higher concentrations chlorite damages blood cells and causes a reduced startle response in rats. In people exposed to higher levels of chlorine dioxide methemoglobin levels are increased after the exposure. These chemicals are also considered a respirator irritant.
Another thing to consider is that sodium chlorite is listed as a pesticide...
After doing my best to warn of the possible adverse effects and the experimental nature of sodium chlorite, let's move on to chemistry.
Sodium chlorite is involved with chlorine dioxide technology, acidified sodium chlorite technology involving chlorous acid, and sodium chlorite technology. The biggest difference in all of these is the activation.
Those who have studied WF-10 and NP001 should have noticed that there is a lot done on the activation side to get these chemicals to the point where they can be injected into the bloodstream with minimal side effects. The activation process is critical to the successful use of sodium chlorite.
Those are the highlights of the cautions. I don't want to give false hope to anyone. It is possible that NP001 has some "magic" formulation that accounts for its effectiveness. Sodium chlorite is basic. It may not work the same as NP001, in fact it probably won't. Still I believe chlorite is chlorite. If chlorite is the cause of the improvements people are seeing, then there is more than one way to get chlorite into the body.
I am not a medical professional. If anyone is thinking about drinking a sodium chlorite solution they should be monitored by someone that has an understanding of oxidative stress. I would suggest starting with some blood work to get a base line to compare with, and monitoring liver enzymes wouldn't be a bad idea. The neurological issues don't seem to manifest themselves until extended exposure to chlorite, still it would be good to record a discussion before starting, if possible, just to have a comparison if changes occur.
There have been many discussions about various "snake oil" treatments for ALS. This may end up as one of those. I wish I had 10 million dollars and 10 years to study this, but I don't, and many people here can't wait 10 years.
I can provide instructions on how to mix a batch up, if there is interest in trying this "snake oil." No promises concerning effectiveness.
Tom
|