DeeBee wrote:
You can get answers to technical stuff from the MNDA...........here's a quote....
'We’re always happy to answer your questions DeeBee – our ethos is to respond to research queries within three working days of receipt.'
Hi DeeBee,
I could be wrong, but I don't think that MNDA would be an organization that could answer specific questions regarding stem cell research. They appear to be an organization much like the ALS society of Canada that raises awareness, funds research and supports patient care. It appears that MNDA however, is a bit more involved with direct research that the Canadian association, like research into misfolded proteins, some new type of Ritulek, etc. Both organizations fund research toward stem cells treatments, but neither appear to be directly involved.
It seems to me that the people that could answer some of these questions are involved in this:
http://www.brainstorm-cell.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=99&Itemid=99and this:
http://www.brainstorm-cell.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=98&Itemid=98I don't think I'm alone in wanting to understand some basic concepts of this “miracle” cure experienced by the rabbi. Did the rabbi receive an intrathecal administration into the CSF? Or into the spinal cord with guided radiography (as it appears the MD in roy's post was doing but with fat derived stem cells)? What is the difference between the bone marrow derived stem cells used in BrainStorm and the now debunked an defunk X-cell center in Germany? Is it that in the latter, the cells were never differentiated, but in Brainstorm, they use a special process to differentiate these cells in order that they secrete GDNF and BDNF? If intrathecal administration of differentiated MSC holds potential promise, why did a more risky surgical procedure need to be developed in conjunction with Neuralstem (i.e. exposing a section of the spinal cord, mounting a specialized instrument onto the area, and inserting a probe into the gray matter in order to administer SC)? How do fetal spinal cord stem cells compare with differentiated bone marrow derived MSC with regards to efficacy in animal studies?
If the rabbi's experience does not end up being a flash in the pan and can indeed be reproducible, then perhaps this treatment can be expedited after Phase II for compassionate use for many more people? This technique may be a much easier and much less invasive procedure than the one done by the surgeon working in conjunction with Neuralstem.
I'm sure other inquiring minds would like to know the answers to some of these questions.
Bummer about your experience in Israel, Masha1.
As an aside, on the list of scientific papers included on Brainstorm-cell's website, was this:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17185746I guess your Scotch eggs recipe could possibly make a difference DeeBee. :)